Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: heartwood
Today, the majority goes beyond the necessities of this case to limit how Section 3 can bar an oathbreaking insurrectionist from becoming President. Although we agree that Colorado cannot enforce Section 3, we protest the majority’s effort to use this case to define the limits of federal enforcement of that provision. Because we would decide only the issue before us, we concur only in the judgment.

They are already planning the next move.

125 posted on 03/04/2024 7:31:26 AM PST by Jim Noble (Assez de mensonges et de phrases)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]


To: Jim Noble

Who is the “oathbreaking insurrectionist” they speak of? Trump was never charged with insurrection so how can he be guilty of that? And if oathbreaking is a disqualifier, then there are ample grounds to decertify Biden based on his refusal to secure the border.


284 posted on 03/04/2024 2:59:22 PM PST by Prince of Space (Trump 2024!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson