I love the Post as much as anyone, but they’re no different than the rest of the media in woefully insufficient coverage of legal issues. The issue that scream out but is completely ignored in this article is what is the relevant state of limitations? One can tell in what state the contract was entered into, but by way of illustration, the statute of limitations for breach of co tract in CA is four years, in DE it is three years. Laws vary from state to state but it looks like breach, the failure to provide any actual services, may have been as long as about 4.5 years ago and that’s a long time in civil law
The fact that the accusation may be beyond the limitations kind of makes my point. It’s ok if this case goes nowhere. It is an attempt to legitimize the payment that Hunter received.