Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: PBRCat

Yes. SCOTUS was wrong to keep the suspense going.

No reason to allow the slander to go on of “amid national debate over whether Trump is disqualified”.
That is based on Leftist political lawfare dirty tricks.


7 posted on 02/28/2024 5:15:37 PM PST by frank ballenger (There's a battle outside and it's raging. It'll soon shake your windows and rattle your walls.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: frank ballenger

The Supreme Court should have ruled the same day they had the hearing it was pretty obvious which way they were leaning they could have just ruled that day instead of dragging on this nonsense


9 posted on 02/28/2024 5:18:09 PM PST by Sarah Barracuda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: frank ballenger

I agree. It is unconscionable that it is taking the Supreme Court this long to make a ruling on something this incredibly important.


14 posted on 02/28/2024 5:32:58 PM PST by volare737
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: frank ballenger

Yes. SCOTUS was wrong to keep the suspense going.

No reason to allow the slander to go on of “amid national debate over whether Trump is disqualified”.
That is based on Leftist political lawfare dirty tricks.

Actually, I think it’s perfect to leave it going. Just to expose all the vile anti-Republic pukes that want to live in socialism/dictatorial countries.


51 posted on 02/29/2024 8:53:05 AM PST by ro_dreaming (Who knew "Idiocracy", "1984", "Enemy of the State", and "Person of Interest" would be non-fiction?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson