Replies

I don't understand how Cardone took it some "other way".

When I read the portion of Hochul's speech: "...I think that this is really an extraordinary, unusual circumstance that the law-abiding and rule-following New Yorkers who are business people have nothing to worry about, because they’re very different than Donald Trump and his behavior..."

I took it to mean:

"...I think that this is really an extraordinary, unusual circumstance that the law-abiding and rule-following New Yorkers who are business people have nothing to worry about, because they’re very different than Donald Trump and his behavior...unless the judiciary of the State of New York decides that you are no different than Donald Trump for whatever reason. And that decision is wholly dependent not on who you are or what you do under the law, but who you are and what you are to the judiciary of the State of New York..."

And judging from Cardone's actions and his call to investors to divest from business in New York, I am of the opinion that he saw that situation exactly as I did, which presents an investment risk.

Cardone obviously saw, as we do, that it has gone from "equal under the rule of law" to "equal under the eyes of New York politicians and judges" and sees that capriciousness as something to be avoided at all costs.

Perhaps I misunderstood your post, which is possible.