Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jpp113

It’s not ex post facto. It’s been on the books as far back as Westlaw has online search capability, so at least since the mid 1980s.

“Illegal law” - um whatnow?

And abuse of civil rights under color of law? No way. First off you can’t sue a court for doing court-stuff. Losing a civil court case is not actionable. Sue the AG? Laughed out of court, she won her case.


264 posted on 02/16/2024 2:44:32 PM PST by CraigEsq (,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 233 | View Replies ]


To: CraigEsq
The ex post facto part is this nugget from 2019:

The New York State Assembly and Senate recently passed legislation proposed by the New York Attorney General (“NYAG”) establishing a six-year statute of limitations for claims brought under the Martin Act and New York Executive Law § 63(12). This legislation comes almost exactly one year after a landmark decision by the New York Court of Appeals holding that Martin Act and Executive Law § 63(12) actions were subject to a three-year statute of limitations

You think holding someone liable for something that happened in 2017 & 2018, when the statute of limitations was 3 years, then changing the statute of limitations to 6 years so you can sue him in 2023 for it is kosher?

274 posted on 02/16/2024 3:02:25 PM PST by jpp113
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 264 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson