For those of us who missed it, at about the 6 minute mark is where they threw him under an Abrams tank and rolled it back and forth over him...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yxNDSOUH91w
6:22 you recall answering questions as though you left due to a disagreement?
6:29 Yes. Yes.
6:34 And that disagreement was that there was an allegation of sexual assault by an employee made against you. Correct?
6:40 That is incorrect.
6:41 There was not an allegation that you assaulted us, that you sexually assaulted one of the employees in the firm.
6:52 That is incorrect.
But yes, yes, there was navigation that you sexually assaulted a member of the firm. Correct?
7:06 Yes, there was an allegation. Yes.
7:07 And as a result of that allegation, you left...”
That was quite a manipulation of the question and the facts, wasn’t it? It ranked right up there with “it depends on the meaning of ‘is’”. I said to myself “What? What was his response?” Now the media can use one part of his answer to manipulate the entire exchange.
I noticed Bradley was quick to answer when the question favored himself or Willis, but he really, really, really had to think when the truth shed a bad light on either of them. And that is when he really looked horrible.