I went back and rewatched the Bradley testimony because it was so confusing. But I couldn’t find the testimony or event that caused the state’s attorneys to suddenly turn against him. What was it? They obviously decided he was a liability and tried to destroy him.
“I couldn’t find the testimony or event that caused the state’s attorneys to suddenly turn against him. What was it?”
I don’t know, but it was clear. Obviously, the guy has a lot of sh!t that can bring down Fani & Nate.
Toward the end, something was said that put in to question all of Bradley’s statements about “privilege” between him and his client (Wade). It was subtle. But then (IIRC) the judge said something like he’ll have to decide whether a lot of what Bradley claimed during his testimony was privilege wasn’t really. (I think I heard this right. It was subtle.)
Anyhow, if those issues he claimed were privileged were NOT, this could erupt. He may have to go back and be asked all those questions and actually answer them.
I took a nap right before he finally showed up. Wow! They did a number on that guy...
I took a nap right before he finally showed up. Wow. They did a number on that guy...
“”””I went back and rewatched the Bradley testimony because it was so confusing. But I couldn’t find the testimony or event that caused the state’s attorneys to suddenly turn against him. What was it? They obviously decided he was a liability and tried to destroy him.””””
I am thinking the Fani lawyers are trying to get Judge McAfee to base his ruling against Fani on client-privilege grounds, so they have a appellate issue.
I believe the Judge is too wise to fall into this trap. Yesterday’s testimony was enough to sink Fani.
“I went back and rewatched the Bradley testimony because it was so confusing. But I couldn’t find the testimony or event that caused the state’s attorneys to suddenly turn against him. What was it? They obviously decided he was a liability and tried to destroy him.”
They know that Bradley knows...the truth. And, they were afraid the judge picked up on that. Therefore, he had to have his credibility destroyed. I think they made a bad decision because that was about the time the Judge decided he and Mr. Bradley needed to speak in chambers so the Judge could determine how much of Bradley’s knowledge was based upon attorney/client privilege and how much was known by personal friendly interactions.