Well, with no proof, we’ll have a repeat of 2020.
Could be true, but probably not.
Whiskey Tango Halifax?
I’m not sure I’d provide any names either. The courts are
almost giddy at the prospect of putting Conservatives in
prison for a half-decade or more.
Garbage logic, what kind of “evidence” is the issue. Not the idea of no evidence.
I persons statement can constitute evidence.
I’ve had some reservations about this bunch since they started out working as contractors for the fibbers.
Plus they fired blanks in AZ didn’t they?
bkmk
- - - -
Heritage Foundation - A Sampling of Recent Election Fraud Cases from Across the United States
https://www.heritage.org/voterfraud
- - - -
Summary of Election Fraud in the 2020 Presidential Election in the Swing States
January 4, 2024 - PDF file
- - - -
The Navarro Report Vol I, II, III - Feb. 2, 2021
Peter Navarro - PDF file (Dropbox.com link - where you click on a few buttons in succession, to get the downloaded PDF file)
- - - -
Counties Using Dominion Voting Systems
EXCERPTS from November 21, 2020 FraudSpotters article by Ben Turner:
Statistical Evidence of Dominion Election Fraud? Time to Audit the Machines
- - - -
Here is an evidence collection - "this is a crowdsourcing tool for organizing anomalies and legal issues":
Here is the Evidence
https://hereistheevidence.com/
- - - -
Mail-in Ballots Curb-Side Collection Site [Donald J. Trump Twitter account video of 11/11/2020 still works 07/19/2023]
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1326630618831130624
- - - -
Tracking all the court cases
A Running Compendium of Fraud Charges in Election 2020
- - - -
Re U.S. voting systems connected to internet
January 10, 2020 - NBC News:
'Online and vulnerable': Experts find nearly three dozen U.S. voting systems connected to internet
- - - -
People need to look at this article and see what is written, what is not written, how it is worded, why it is worded that way, and who wrote it.
Do those five things, and this article will make more sense.
"It'll even scan a batch of blank ballots and vote for whoever you tell it to"
For example: You can collect 960 mailed in ballots for Trump, and [administratively] mess them up enough to *force 'adjudication'* and then shred/trash those Trump ballots . . . and then substitute 960 pre-printed blank ballots and "administratively adjudicate" the blanks, for Biden.
Biden’s dog Commander ate the ballot fraud evidence.
And then bit the Republicans who inquired about it.
Of course they don’t. The far-left, yellowstream “media” kept that crap close to their vest.
I keep wondering about the movie 2000 Mules, where they used phone data to show the same people coming back to ballot drop boxes over & over again. Isn’t THAT proof of ballot box stuffing? And why isn’t TTV presenting it?
Over years of opposition research, I learned that whispers and rumors about the opposition were often hard to either prove or disprove — especially the most enticing ones. Unless you paid close attention to standards of evidence and proof, you could be led down endless rabbit trails. This may be what happened to True The Vote — or they may have reached the limits of time and resources, with the evidence remaining hidden because of the skill and preparation of their adversaries.
Okay, that’s one version.
What’s the real story?
..or your own lyin’ eyes ?
-fJRoberts-
“Widely debunked film?”
Surprise, surprise, surprise.
In other words, TTV refused to provide names of protected sources, to protect them from retribution.
Catherine and Gregg were handcuffed and imprisoned for refusing to divulge name of a protected source.
Catherine was forced to shower in front of male guards.