Posted on 02/07/2024 7:15:02 AM PST by Tench_Coxe
“So, she doesn’t want voters that are aware of all voting options?”
I think you nailed it. The author thinks voters should be kept in the dark. Odd. Maybe we should ban all real education too. Let’s keep everyone in the dark.
It seems that journalists like being “gate-keepers of information.” Not only that, but we should all approve that they keep secrets.
What’s the mindset that we are supposed to have? Perhaps it is something like this: Yes, I’m glad you mislead us, because other people would do the wrong thing if they knew the truth. Thanks for the censorship!
“ABC pretending to look out for Republicans.”
Yes. Our one-party press routinely tries to help us. Something like: Shoot yourself in the head. You’ll get everyone’s sympathy.
>>How can she and her handlers spin this as some sort of victory?
Came in second place? Same as NH...
“journalists like being “gate-keepers of information.”
One of the most effective tactics liberal media has is blacking out or ignoring a story or information that goes against their narrative.
Dispicable yes, but effective none the less.
Or they just look straight into the camera and flat out lie.
For example:
‘It will kill you’: Fox News warns viewers after Trump says he has been taking hydroxychloroquine
Came in second place? Same as NH..
As Picabo Street (Olympic skier) was heard to say, second place is “First Loser”.
Maybe I’m ignorant of how the Nevada process works, but I was under the impression that the “None of These Candidates” option is really just symbolic because it can’t actually WIN an election.
Nevada has been a caucus state when it came to choosing Presidential candidates.
The Democrats decided to abandon the caucus system and passed a law requiring a non binding Presidential Preference Primary if more than one candidate is running for office.
The Republicans choose to keep the caucus system and are running a purely symbolic primary with no impact to comply with the law.
Easy to spin this: “Nikki Haley: Second to None!” Oddly, it’s a campaign slogan with some truth in it.
It’s been tried before, wasn’t allowed. I remember reading about it in the 80s.
It was a symbolic “we hate Nikki’s guts” vote.
I congratulate all Nevada voters who stood tall and delivered that very clear message.
Hey Douglass, None of these has been around since 1975.
And furthermore,
Haley...became the first presidential candidate from either party to lose a race to “none of these candidates” since that option was introduced in Nevada in 1975.
https://www.newsmax.com/us/nikki-haley-nevada-donald-trump/2024/02/07/id/1152598/
Haley’s viability and ground game is a fraud.
What’s to know? No one wants her. She lost. Nevada made fools of themselves.
“How can she and her handlers spin this as some sort of victory?”
She was second to none...
“What if somebody changes their name legally to “None Of The Above”?”
Not Sure.
MAGA voters now know Nikki’s agenda very well. More foreign wars to pad benefits for her benefactors, the MIC (Military Industrial Complex). And compromise with democrats when confronted. What a contrast she is with Vivek who made his own fortune, While Nikki has sucked on government tit all her career.
That’s an interesting idea. You might be on to something.
People may not know she’s an anchor baby
Which explains why she doesn’t hold desr many things traditionally American
All I did was tell people her birth name
But she IS a major poser
Just like Barack Hussein Obama
🤣😂
“Just like Barack Hussein Obama”
Right. The day after BO’s inauguration, one of the ladies in my quilting group was incensed. “Did you hear what his middle name is?!?”
I said that we’ve known that for years because we pay attention instead of watching American Idol.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.