Nikki Haley: US Should Strike and Kill Iranian Leaders Inside Their Country -- “We’ve Got to Do This Immediately!”

The Gateway Pundit ^ | January 29, 2024 | Jim Hoft

[Macho MAGA Man]

Nikki Haley is on the warpath. Haley wants to blow up the mullahs in Iran like Soleimani. Take them out with a missile strike.

That ought to calm things down in the Middle East!

Brian Kilmeade: You’re saying now’s the time to hit Iran?

Nikki Haley: Now’s the time to hit their leaders. It’s different. Don’t go and bomb the country.

Brian Kilmeade: What about their infrastructure?

Nikki Haley: The infrastructure in Iraq and Syria. You start with that first. You do the sanctions and you take out a couple of their leaders. That’s the way…

Brian Kilmeade: In their country?

Nikki Haley: If they’re in their country, you do like Soleimani, when they left the country. You figure out where they are. Our special operations can do that. And then you take them out. That will send a message. We’ve got to do this immediately

[USA-FRANCE]

So... according to you, Trump is a “bloodthirsty true-natural born” citizen now?? I don’t agree.
Was Trump looking for “blood and ecstasy” when he killed Iranian leaders and vowed to target countless of Iranian targets?

Trump vows to hit 52 Iranian targets if Iran retaliates after drone strike (ordered by Trump)
https://www.reuters.com/article/idUSKBN1Z4002/

I don’t agree with you, because happen to fully support Trump’s pro-war stance against Iran.

If Haley wants to copycat Trump on being tough against Iran, is that a problem?? Good for her if Trump is a source of inspiration for her.

I hope we Trump-supporters are not turning into peace-doves... Time for some tough talk against our enemies.

We have to stop playing from the Chamberlain appeasement cook-book.

[Rastus]

That was arguably the finest album The Police ever did.

[LS]

Correct.

[Macho MAGA Man]

Trump has always been a true natural born Citizen.

Nimrata Randhawa has never been a true natural born Citizen.

[13F FISTer]

I think there was a time that your approach would have already been executed and desired change occurring as we speak. Unfortunatley Iran is now flush with cash and has aligned with so many proxy “resistance” groups, the approach would end in chaos. We'd be looking at potential retaliation from Iran proper, definite proxy attacks from their “Axis of Reistance,” including Hezbollah, Hamas and the Houthis resulting in a greater U.S. presence in the area. Potential nuclear proliferation as Tehran restarts/accelerates their nuclear efforts (if they ever slowed), and distracts our attention from Ukraine, China, Taiwan..etc. Average Iranians are notoriously committed to their political and military leaders (keeping your head 101) and will support them through all of these potential outcomes.

[Segovia]

I don’t think it’s “legal” to declare war on an organization, either. That’s why we invaded Afghanistan instead of invading al-Qaida. Get real.

[Segovia]

Well, you know, the guys who make the rules made that rule, they’re also the guys who make the wars for your kids to die in,,,, very convenient for them, don’t you agree.

[Skywise]

In deference to your ignorance…. It’s legal.

Perhaps you’ve heard of the Barbary Pirates.

Get real.