It’s just a civil judgment. Good luck trying to collect.
This case may have been the worst outrage of all of the various outrages launched at Trump. One kangaroo court just decides out of thin air, with zero evidence, that Trump had raped her, and then the next kangaroo court awards ludicrous damages based upon that lie. And all along, Trump’s accuser was an obvious total fruitcake who probably doesn’t even know what day it is. She’s one of the nuttiest leftist nuts I’ve seen in a while, and that’s saying something.
All of that said, Trump’s biggest mistake was probably saying that this loon “wasn’t his type”, but then misidentifying a photo of her as Marla Maples. An innocent mistake, but he needs to restrain his instinct to go too overboard sometimes in defending himself. I think he just by nature wants to put an exclamation point on his denials of obvious lies against him, but that sometimes opens new lines of attack for his enemies to use.
He’s going to have to sit for depositions in which he’ll be required to disclose his assets. Bank accounts, real estate, businesses, personal property, any of which can be attached. And there are companies out there which pursue collection of judgments for a percentage. Do you think that they won’t want to get a piece of this?
Why is THE incident referred to as an “assault” - was it rape or not? I know it’s preferable to use “assault” but why not tell it like it is? And if I recall - WHATEVER it was happened in a dressing room in a store. If that’s correct, what would have prevented her from screaming - RAPE!!!??? Surely there were other patrons in the store. Did he use chloroform on her or stuff a gag in her mouth?
“It’s just a civil judgment. Good luck trying to collect”.
You don’t know how relieved I am to read that. Thank you.