“Fox News settled rather than let the evidence of voting machine tampering be introduced in a credible court.”
Not quite. Dr. Haldeman testified that the Dominion machines could be easily compromised, but also testified that he had no evidence they had been compromised. Fox was was sued for publicly stating that the Dominion machines had been compromised, but couldn’t prove that they had.
IIRC, part of the accusation against Dominion was Dominion stating that their machines couldn't be hacked, and Dominion was aggressively suing anyone who suggested otherwise. Fox's settlement scared off others from challenging Dominion's claims.
Now we know that Dominion was wrong. Their machines are hackable. The question now is, did they know it all along and used lawfare to shut people up to protect their reputation, or did they truly not know the vulnerabilities of their own technology?
-PJ