Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: taxcontrol

I used to agree with this. My main concern is somebody or some group, backed by massive funding, being able to find a vulnerability to specifically NOT disclose it. Then use it as desired.

It’s just far more difficult to commit widespread fraud with paper ballots and manual counting, with lots of eyes. Otherwise, it can be done with a click, seen by nobody.


20 posted on 01/26/2024 10:17:34 AM PST by fuzzylogic (welfare state = sharing of poor moral choices among everybody)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: fuzzylogic

“My main concern is somebody or some group, backed by massive funding, being able to find a vulnerability to specifically NOT disclose it. “

Absolutely. Look at the amount of money that was offered to Kari Lake to drop out of politics for a couple years. She could have been a very rich woman.

That is EXACTLY why all vote machines should use open-source software. The code would be available to the public for scrutiny.


24 posted on 01/26/2024 10:31:42 AM PST by ProtectOurFreedom (“Occupy your mind with good thoughts or your enemy will fill them with bad ones.” ~ Thomas More)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson