Murder, and child prostitution, were never legal in the first place, so you have a failed argument. My point is that by making it “more difficult” as you say, would cause more harm to society than letting them be in their own home. By eliminating the online viewing, there will be a spike in prostitution, including child prostitution, because the evil in society will see an opportunity to help them scratch the itch.
Let’s look at this from a different lens that maybe you, or at least a majority of Freepers, could relate to. What if the libs came out and said they were implementing a ban on any weapon that had a magazine, of ANY size. Thier argument would be “anywhere we can make it more difficult for school shooters the better”. We both know what would happen, beyond the outrage ... First, people would stock up on guns with magazines before the ban went into effect, many thinking they could profit handsomely once the ban was in place. Then, there would become a massive black market for guns with magazines. Nobody would admit to having one, but in short order, everyone would know someone who knew someone that could get you what you needed. And the desire to fulfill that need would become greater than it was before the ban ... that is the way people are wired ... just look at the toilet paper shortages in early COVID.
Or maybe the analogy would be a parent telling a daughter she cant date a specific loser. Yeah, you will make it harder for her to see him, until the day she comes home and announces he is her baby daddy.
The net effect is that your “just making it more difficult” proposition actually turns passive participants into obsessed zealots, and you create markets that will be significantly harder to close down in the future.
Go back to sleep or back to youe pornhub fool. You don’t even understand the difference between a natural right and pornography...and child molestation and slavery.
A law should not be prevented from being implemented because the bad guys may switch their activities...I just don’t believe you have the wherewithal to think this through. You probably are basically reciting someone else’s rhetoric without analyzing too deep.