Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Macho MAGA Man

Under the 14th Amendment’s Naturalization Clause and the Supreme Court case of United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 US. 649, anyone born on U.S. soil and subject to its jurisdiction is a natural born citizen, regardless of parental citizenship. This type of citizenship is referred to as birthright citizenship.


61 posted on 12/27/2023 10:41:18 PM PST by 4 Libertys sake (Fighting the good fight against enemies, domestic and unrepentant!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]


To: 4 Libertys sake

Wong was never affirmed an Article 2 Section 1 natural born Citizen.


63 posted on 12/27/2023 11:00:35 PM PST by Macho MAGA Man (The last two weren't balloons. One was a cylindrical objects Trump is being given the Alex Jones tr)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]

To: 4 Libertys sake

FOS. There is a “natural born citizen” clause in the constitution for a reason regarding the presidency. Wong addressed citizenship, not the question of natural born citizen.


72 posted on 12/28/2023 2:59:16 AM PST by Segovia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]

To: 4 Libertys sake

There is nothing in United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 US. 649 that says Ark was an Art. II, §1, cl. 5 natural-born citizen. Let’s not forget, that Ark’s parents eventually moved back to China. Ark is a naturalized citizen at birth via 14A §1. Citizenship ascribed by law is naturalized citizenship. Citizenship ascribed by natural law as a natural right is natural citizenship at birth.


86 posted on 12/28/2023 6:32:03 AM PST by batazoid (Plainclothes cop at Capital during Jan 6 riot...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson