Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

SCOTUS Will Rule 9-0 in Colorado Case: Ex-WH Lawyer Cobb
Newsmax ^ | December 20, 2023 | Sandy Fitzgerald

Posted on 12/20/2023 7:32:57 AM PST by Navy Patriot

The U.S. Supreme Court could rule "9-0" for President Donald Trump if he appeals the Colorado Supreme Court's ruling kicking him off the state's 2024 ballot, former White House lawyer Ty Cobb is predicting.

"I think this case will be handled quickly. I think it could be 9-0 in the Supreme Court for Trump," Cobb, who has served as a member of the Trump administration legal team, told CNN's Erin Burnett Tuesday after the ruling. "It will be a race to get there. I mean, the Supreme Court, though, will not hesitate to move quickly on this. They know what is at stake."

He also argued that the "law is clear" on the issue.

(Excerpt) Read more at newsmax.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 last
To: Political Junkie Too
in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct,

That is a point often forgotten. The several State Legislatures are, each in its own State, the absolute masters of the Presidential election. Courts have nothing to do with it. Any judge who gets involved, other than to tell a lower ranking judge to butt out, is violating his own oath of office.

61 posted on 12/20/2023 11:40:28 AM PST by NorthMountain (... the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: NorthMountain
But most importantly, that applies to the manner of choosing Electors to the Electoral College, which is a general election thing.

This court's ruling is for the primary election, which is strictly party business. Where does a court deign to tell a party who they can run in their own primary elections?

-PJ

62 posted on 12/20/2023 11:53:49 AM PST by Political Junkie Too ( * LAAP = Left-wing Activist Agitprop Press (formerly known as the MSM))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Political Junkie Too

Yes ... it’s a naked power grab.

Not sure how things in your State work. In WV, we don’t vote for a candidate in Presidential primary elections. We vote for convention delegates who are pledge to initial support for a particular candidate.


63 posted on 12/20/2023 12:10:41 PM PST by NorthMountain (... the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: sasquatch
The idea behind my post was that Ty Cobb the lawyer was chosen to be in the news on a specific date and for a specific reason - because he shares a name with Ty Cobb of baseball, a Scottish Rite Freemason.

Certain numbers have esoteric meaning and symbolism, like 9, 13 and 33 in Freemasonry.

There are numbers that show up often in the news and in current events. 33 and 13 are common. Both these numbers are also prominent in U.S. history, government and culture.

64 posted on 12/20/2023 2:28:03 PM PST by yelostar (Spook codes 33 and 13. See them often in headlines and news stories. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Political Junkie Too

BTTT!


65 posted on 12/20/2023 8:56:40 PM PST by Pagey ( Valerie Jarrett IS A DEMON! )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Pagey
Here's more.

The same 14th amendment prevents the Colorado Supreme Court from removing anyone from the Presidential ballot.

The 14th amendment section 2 has a punishment for abridging the right to vote:

But when the right to vote at any election for the choice of electors for President and Vice-President of the United States, Representatives in Congress, the Executive and Judicial officers of a State, or the members of the Legislature thereof, is denied to any of the male inhabitants of such State, being twenty-one years of age, and citizens of the United States, or in any way abridged, except for participation in rebellion, or other crime, the basis of representation therein shall be reduced in the proportion which the number of such male citizens shall bear to the whole number of male citizens twenty-one years of age in such State.
Note that this buttresses the exclusion of the President and Vice President from section 3, since section 2 speaks about denying or abridging the right to vote for the choice of Electors, and keeping someone off the ballot is the highest form of denial and abridgment.

The authors of the amendment were afraid that state institutions (especially the state courts) would pass laws post-emancipation to deny full access to the ballot, both as voters (abridged) and as candidates (choice of Electors). Now we have the Colorado Supreme Court trying to do just that, keep someone off of the ballot.

The Constitutional punishment for preventing voters from voting for Electors of their choice in a state should be the direct loss of seats in the House of Representatives, and the indirect loss of Electors in the next election.

If the Colorado Supreme Court blocks President Trump from appearing on the ballot, they are denying the entire state the right to choose President Trump. It doesn't matter what polling suggests the actual vote would be, the entire state is denied the choice.

The 14th amendment should punish Colorado with the loss of their ENTIRE House delegation, and with it their Electoral College allocation, leaving Colorado with only the two Electors based on the Senate.

-PJ

66 posted on 12/20/2023 8:59:52 PM PST by Political Junkie Too ( * LAAP = Left-wing Activist Agitprop Press (formerly known as the MSM))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Navy Patriot

I am expecting a 5-4 ruling against Trump. Roberts, Sotomayor, Kagan, Jackson, and Gorsuch. Gorsuch is a Colorado boy, can’t oppress the homies.


67 posted on 12/21/2023 7:14:48 AM PST by damper99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson