"But for our resolution of the Electors’ challenge under the Election Code,the Secretary would be required to include President Trump’s name on the 2024 presidential primary ballot.
Therefore, to maintain the status quo pending any review by the U.S. Supreme Court, we stay our ruling until January 4, 2024 (the day before the Secretary’s deadline to certify the content of the presidential primary ballot). If review is sought in the Supreme Court before the stay expires on January 4, 2024, then the stay shall remain in place, and the Secretary will continue to be required to include President Trump’s name on the 2024 presidential primary ballot, until the receipt of any order or mandate from the Supreme Court."
Read it for yourself....
A little strategy would be noce by the Trump team. I think what they did is rule that the President is not immune not necessarily that he is guilty of anything. Isn’t it possible on that narrow question Scotus concurs? I think it would be wise to get a broader question before the courts. Don’t take this to SCOTUS because they always look for a narrow decision and this gives them an easy way to say they haven’t ruled on the totality of the 14th but it will be enough to keep Trump off ballots until something more specific works it’s way through. I think the initial ruling purposely used the immunity argument because of how narrow that would make the appeal question.