[ifinnegan]

You are a bit insufferable.

Reiterating things over and over.

After I said “yes.”

There’s no reason to be so confrontational.

My point stands. It was not over.

And I noted they were doing it via appeal, which you reiterate here in this post.

I was right it was not over in the initial dispositive decision.

Your Megan points are appreciated and good. But somewhat beside the point in terms of political machinations.

“ I literally cannot make it any clearer than that.”

You’re not a particularly good writer.

Stink bait being a highly specific legal term.

I think you can add a lot if you get off your high horse.

[StAnDeliver]

Look, noob, you are the one who lamely attempted to call me out over your own inability to articulate your opinion. Nothing more than a disgusting repeat of what I did to you in the original thread you were so desperate to renew and relive.

I do not care what is at the bottom of your glass, you got busted on jurisprudence, you got beat down with the facts; and single-spacing your bitching about it isn't impressing anyone.

This isn't the local bar, this isn't the Arby's coffee klatsch, this website is devoted to the advancement of Constitutionalism and there is nothing more serious than the topic of this thread -- our former President enduring illicit lawfare that has now metastisized into the highest courts in blue states.

Grow the f up or get off this site.