even a liberal publication will at some point realize, accept and slightly modify their positions when faced with the looming prospect of a paradigm shift in the politics of their readership as a whole. not “all of a sudden” mind you but as a long term strategy to remain relevant and still be profitable. two things seem to be happening...one is the movement Trump heads is NOT going away and two...NO publication that wants to be profitable in the coming future wants to be on the wrong side of History. except the hardcore leftist rags. they don’t care anyway. ideologues will spend themselves into oblivion to push their ideological qwap...even when NO ONE CARES what they believe. sad but true.
The NY Times is a leftist rag perpetually on the wrong side of history.
The Reagan revolution ended the day Bush took office.
I appreciate the enthusiasm but with no successor in sight the long term viability of MAGA is in constant peril.