Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: vespa300

“My understanding, after watching hundreds of videos of those guys who go around videoing, it’s suspicion of a crime, not actually charging someone........where ID must be produced. You don’t have to be charged, but there must be suspicion of a crime and then you must produce ID. They may not ulimately charge you....but there must be suspicion required.

They cannot just demand ID without suspicion. That’s the test. AS I understand it.”

Absolutely. And suspicion legally requires probable cause that can be proved. They can’t just stop someone walking along the sidewalk, street, or public space and ID them without probable cause. If you are just riding in the back seat of a vehicle they cannot ID you without probable cause against just you as an individual. Even “guilt by association” does not give them the right. They have to have something directly against you personally.


93 posted on 12/09/2023 4:38:34 AM PST by Openurmind (The ultimate test of a moral society is the kind of world it leaves to its children. ~ D. Bonhoeffer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies ]


To: Openurmind

It only stands to reason that you cannot be required to provide ID if you are not required to carry ID. We are not required to carry ID in America, unless we are driving.


100 posted on 12/09/2023 4:52:41 AM PST by Theophilus (It's far easier to rig a jury than an electionhe )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson