This morning I was listening to a couple of Richard Dolan videos and he is making an argument I have not seen elsewhere—and it is as terrifying as the worst alien abduction story....
He suggests that the government cannot cross the “red line” of UFO disclosure (which he defines as releasing proof of possession of alien craft and bodies) until.....
They have the capability of effectively silencing all dissent so they can fully manage and control the narrative.
That would probably involve criminalizing any speech opposing the narrative (version of events) as “evil and dangerous conspiracy theories” probably planted by Russia Russia Russia etal....
The narrative would be some form of “we killed some whistleblowers in the “bad old days”—but it was necessary for national security”.
The Intel Community has its back up against the wall over the UAP Disclosure Bill and Congress. It's anyone's guess where this is going. It seems that they (the IC) are putting all their chips behind Mike Turner (chrm of the Intel Committee) and he is mad as hell (or so I hear).
I have been listening to Steve Bassett on various podcasts over the last week and he seems to have the best take on the situation in DC at the moment.
I am a little more optimistic lately but you never know til the fat lady sings.;-)
What I can't figure out is why Speaker Mike Johnson is backing Turner on this matter. Hopefully Johnson will come to his senses. The only thing I have heard from Johnson is that he thinks the bill is poorly written...not that it shouldn't be passed.
I hear the biggest fight is over eminent domain (which apparently means the contractors don't want to lose the assets they have accumulated).
As we have said over and over again, if there was nothing to disclose, the Deep State wouldn't be fighting tooth and nail to kill the bill.