Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sauropod

“Private company.
It sux, but they can ban whomever they want to.”

That is the first thought but it gives me pause. I think of Google. Well over 80% of searches go through them. When 80% of information inquiries are manipulated to favor one point of view it is a big problem. YouTube his a near monopoly also. Evil people will exploit our freedoms until we lose them.


36 posted on 11/07/2023 7:09:51 AM PST by iamgalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]


To: iamgalt

I agree. These apps like facebook, etc, that can instantly access ongoing live public events on our phone, serve a first amendment role (similar to news gathering organizations) of insuring that we have an informed public, which presumes that the information is accessible and factual. These company policies serve at cross purposes to that.

The facts—not the owners opinions—is what we expect and demand.


39 posted on 11/07/2023 7:43:45 AM PST by aligncare ( Make America America Again…Trump 2024)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

To: iamgalt

Not disagreeing.

I think it is the consumer’s responsibility to patronize other companies than Screwgle.


40 posted on 11/07/2023 7:46:38 AM PST by sauropod (The obedient always think of themselves as virtuous rather than cowardly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson