Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Angelino97
First of all, Johnson didn't blame the fall of Rome on homosexuality. He merely stated a fact (paraphrased),
"Historians might consider the decline of Rome as partially related to a societal loss of morals and widespread homosexual behavior condoned during that period."
Historians DID make the above conclusions. That's a well-known fact.
44 posted on 11/04/2023 3:22:54 AM PDT by RoosterRedux (A person who seeks the truth with a strong bias will never find it. He will only confirm his bias.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: RoosterRedux
Historians DID make the above conclusions.

Yes, but the historians were talking more about a decline of civic responsibility than of private morality. It wasn't so much private vices in themselves, it was that they got in the way of public obligations and responsibilities. Earlier Romans hadn't been models of virtue in our sense, but they kept their impulses under control enough to conquer and rule a large part of the world.

109 posted on 11/04/2023 8:59:50 AM PDT by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson