Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: smokingfrog

“I think the objective is to make high speed internet more available in rural areas. In some of those areas, satellite internet is just about the only option.”

Yep.... such is the rural life. What confounds me is you can have a land line yet no internet is available via that land line. Makes absolutely no sense.


25 posted on 10/26/2023 9:32:15 AM PDT by LastDayz (A blunt and brazen Texan. I will not be assimilated.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: LastDayz

Many places you can still get dialup, but I’m not sure it would be worth it.
4G would be much better.
https://www.dialup4less.com/texas.html


29 posted on 10/26/2023 12:29:49 PM PDT by smokingfrog ( sleep with one eye open (<o> --- )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

To: LastDayz
What confounds me is you can have a land line yet no internet is available via that land line. Makes absolutely no sense.

Copper landlines have very limited ability to support anything faster than 56kbps dial-up internet, which in this Year of Grace 2023 is hopelessly obsolete. DSL requires fairly short runs between the switching station and the customer's modem. In rural Texas, that's going to be a problem. For many years, I used DSL in rural WV ... it was a bit dodgy on a good day. Frontier finally ran fiber out our way ... it's a massive improvement.

37 posted on 10/26/2023 1:45:43 PM PDT by NorthMountain (... the right of the peopIe to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson