Posted on 10/25/2023 7:47:33 AM PDT by Heartlander
Douglass Mackey was sentenced to seven months in prison on Wednesday for the crime of insulting Hillary Clinton.
Sending political opponents who mock the ruling class to the gulag is the kind of behavior one usually associates with China, North Korea, or some despotic Middle Eastern regime. Not any more. Now it’s the standard operating procedure of the United States government.
While the West has prided itself on open discourse and liberal democracy, it has become increasingly common to see individuals in European countries go to prison for “hate speech” violations such as using the wrong pronoun or speaking ill of Muslims on social media.
Many of my European friends have told me how envious they are of the First Amendment, an explicit constitutional bulwark meant to protect the right of citizens to speak their mind without fear of state reprisal. It is now clear that this central pillar of American liberty has failed, and the U.S. government has become simply another totalitarian leviathan with the ability to crush dissent by force.
Mackey, who went by the Twitter handle Ricky Vaughn, was put on trial for election interference by the Biden Justice Department after posting a meme he created during the 2016 presidential election. The meme jokingly suggested that Clinton supporters avoid long lines at the polls and cast their votes by text message.
Prosecutors could not produce any evidence that even a single individual had lost the ability to vote by attempting to use the number featured in Mackey’s meme. Nevertheless, the judge decided this totally victimless crime of meme-making warranted seven months in federal prison. Never mind that multiple Clinton supporters produced social media posts or videos making similar jokes, with one going so far as to tell Trump supporters to skip the lines and text their vote on Election Day. But none of them were charged. The charges are fallacious and motivated solely by political vengeance.
The government knows what it is doing is an affront to the rule of law. That’s the point. This is about sending a message, a flex of power meant for all to see.
It is easy for mainstream conservatives to turn a blind eye to Mackey, an edgy internet poster who swam in the meme culture of a bygone election cycle. That’s a mistake. While the seven-month sentence seems light compared to the 10 years Mackey could have faced for his “crime,” the precedent set is absolutely devastating. Mackey missed the birth of his first child due to the sentencing hearing, and the judge refused to issue a stay during the appeals process, so the meme-making satirist will be separated from his family as he fights this incredible injustice.
Knowing that the regime will look for any minor legal justification to incarcerate anyone who mocks it will have a chilling effect on those who would use humor to push back on the absurdity of our ruling class. Comedy is far more threatening than rational argumentation to our contemptable elite, and memes have proven one of the most effective ways to communicate how farcical the clown world we inhabit has now become.
They are not just going after Mackey because they are vengeful or petty; they are going after Mackey because he represents the pseudonymous internet gadflies who humiliate the regime and its grotesque caricature of piety on a daily basis.
There is nothing Western leaders love more than proclaiming their moral superiority. Freedom, tolerance, and democracy are held out as beacons of light with which to shame the despotic leaders of less progressive nations around the world. Amazingly, leaders like Canada’s Justin Trudeau manage to keep a straight face while denouncing the human rights violations of Vladimir Putin, even as he throws Canadian citizens in jail and seizes their bank accounts for protesting COVID lockdowns. The United States has joined these ranks, making itself a self-righteous laughingstock as its leaders mouth empty platitudes about the critical nature of openness and liberty while imprisoning a citizen who makes jokes on the internet.
Although Mackey’s case may seem like a relatively minor news story, if it is allowed to stand, it would effectively mean the death of the First Amendment. Laws limiting “hate speech” or other woke nonsense are already dangerous, but the prosecution of an individual for political jokes strikes directly at the heart of the Constitution.
Some forms of censorship, such as restricting the sale of pornography to minors, have always been allowed by the courts. But one form of speech that the First Amendment has held as absolute is the right to disagree with the government. It is unlikely that the government will suddenly start arresting everyone who mocks it on the internet, but the inconsistent application of the precedent is a feature of anarcho-tyranny, not a bug.
By abusing the wording of obscure laws and manipulating the judicial process, the regime can pretend that Mackey is a radical outlier, and the rule of law remains in place. The illusion of neutral process makes the masses far less likely to push back against tyranny, but the arbitrary nature of that process allows the regime to make it clear that enemies will be punished. Now we walk on eggshells, hoping we’re not indicted next.
Mackey’s conviction is just one of the recent events that do not bode well for the future of our constitutional order. Donald Trump, the leading political opponent of the sitting president, faces a slew of partisan legal charges brought with the obvious intent of influencing the 2024 presidential election. Dozens of Trump supporters face life-ruining charges for being involved in the events of January 6, 2021, despite the fact that leftist protesters regularly rioted, looted, and burned cities around the country in 2020 with little or no legal consequence. The FBI has designated MAGA supporters as the most serious domestic terror threat that America faces.
And all of this comes in the wake of a 2020 presidential election fraught with direct government interference by intelligence and police agencies, as revealed by the Twitter files. If these events were unfolding in any other nation, we would recognize them as the consolidation of hard power against all domestic political rivals, because that is what they are. The Bill of Rights might hold a sacred place in the American civic religion, but if our rulers can throw their opponents into jail on a flimsy pretext, then the document is simply an artifact of a constitutional order that is already dead.
“My question is how corrupt, tyrannical, decadent and incompetent does this circus have to get before you stop defending it?”
I love my country and hate the Deep State, tyrannical police, wokesters in all their forms, Marxists, Leninists, and all other shades of communists. I hate sin. I hate bullying by anyone against anyone else for purposes of sadistic gratification.
I hate the enemies of our Constitution both foreign and domestic.
But above all I love America and the promise of what it can be.
I know they are going to appeal. But none of the search engines and even TWTR search show anything.
Just for the record, here is one instance where a Hillary supporter did exactly the same thing as Mackey. Of course, no charges.
https://twitter.com/MattWalshBlog/status/1715007291550756913
Doesn’t matter. The standard should be whether a hypothetical “reasonable person” should be able to detect whether it’s a joke or whether it’s an actual directive from the government. There’s no way Mackey’s meme would fail to meet that standard, since, just to begin with, the government doesn’t issue election instructions in the form of memes distributed on social media by random people.
The phone number does not make this case more reasonable.
It makes it even more unreasonable.
Why? Because it matters who was at that number. Was it someone who pretended to be part of the voting/election system dutifully taking the vote...or someone who laughed and told the caller he has been had?
The mere existence of a number means nothing.
Was any evidence submitted indicating what conversation ensued during the phone call?
The stories I have read all said not one person’s vote was lost due to the joke. If true, it indicates that all callers.if any, were able to determine that it was a prank.
That’s great !
We are all for Goodness. And against Badness.
But how does that translate into justice for Douglas Mackey, or the J6 people, or 100+ bogus charges against Trump, or the extracted guilty pleas from his supporters, or the FBI and FISA spying on him and his campaign, or the 2020 middle of the night vote drops...
All we get is lectures on the greatness of Muh’ Constitution, when things just get worse and worse and worse and worse.
My answer for now is Trump 2024. I wish I had a better answer right now but that’s it.
I support Trump as well. But only as a fracture mechanism to accelerate Regime collapse.
His first term showed that the Regime has the power to resist any real change.
Reform is impossible. Any change requires Regime collapse.
“Reform is impossible. Any change requires Regime collapse.”
The same could be said of Russia yet there’s still hope that meaningful change can be accomplished without burning down either country.
Agreed. But none of what they do diminishes my love for America even one iota.
Re: 15 - My point is that a bunch of foot-stomping quitters have given up on the Constitution and in some cases the United States.
But President Trump hasn’t. Yes, I know he is sometimes his own worst enemy. But he has not given up on the Constitution or the US.
He’d undoubtedly be disappointed at people who claim to be his most ardent supporters.
Concur.
LMAO! I had never seen that. No wonder the people who fell for it were incensed.
Which is the DUmp.
You're not bright enough to analyze where we are as a nation - hence, the jackassin' you spread all over these threads. 
Democrats aren't "reasonable people".
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.