Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Red Badger

We have no treaty obligation to defend the Philippines.


5 posted on 10/23/2023 8:34:50 AM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: kabar

The first sentence of the article:

“The United States renewed a warning Monday that it would defend the Philippines in case of an armed attack under a 1951 treaty”


7 posted on 10/23/2023 8:43:18 AM PDT by jimwatx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: kabar

“We have no treaty obligation to defend the Philippines.”

Your country (whoever the hell your ‘we’ represents) may not have such a treaty but the United States and the Philippines do.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mutual_Defense_Treaty_(United_States%E2%80%93Philippines)

“The Mutual Defense Treaty between the Republic of the Philippines and the United States of America (MDT) was signed on August 30, 1951 by their representatives in Washington, D.C.. The treaty has eight articles and requires both nations to support each other if another party attacks the Philippines or the United States.”


10 posted on 10/23/2023 8:51:43 AM PDT by MeganC (There is nothing feminine about feminism. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: kabar

Please ask your parent or guardian to read and explain the article to you before you post.


12 posted on 10/23/2023 9:08:44 AM PDT by Farmerbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: kabar

“We have no treaty obligation to defend the Philippines.”
*****************************************************************************
Although SEATO went out of business in 1977, I suspect one or both of these are still in effect. Probably others too.

1) ANZUS Treaty, was an agreement signed in 1951 to protect the security of the Pacific.

2) Mutual Defense Treaty Between the United States and the Republic of the Philippines; August 30, 1951

Not that it matters, if the Biden administration wants & needs a war, I am sure they will come up with better reason than Bush’s,
“He wanted to kill my daddy, so he has weapons a mass destruction”
which worked pretty well.


13 posted on 10/23/2023 9:13:07 AM PDT by Tupelo (( e pluribus unum is now ex uno multis))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: kabar

Wrong.


19 posted on 10/23/2023 3:31:17 PM PDT by dadgum (Enough!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: kabar

We have no treaty obligation to defend the Philippines


And which country are living in?


20 posted on 10/23/2023 4:00:38 PM PDT by tsowellfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson