Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Eleutheria5

“The Ukraine funding will be discussed and voted on in a separate bill.”

A majority of GOP House members oppose further funding.

It’s very unlikely to even get a vote in the House.


22 posted on 09/30/2023 3:42:04 PM PDT by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: Mariner

Oh, well. Ukraine will continue to fight for its existence. Z will continue to lead that fight. And a majority of GOP House members will be on the wrong side of history. Europe is doing more, though. Which they ought to. England continues to do its part, which makes sense. They were on the receiving end once.

To some extent I agree with them. The “funding” should have been lend-lease, which is how the US funded England until Pearl Harbor.

More tanks are a moot point, because while the US and Europe was dithering about to give tanks or not give tanks, Russia was laying anti-tank mines, and so long as Russia has artillery covering the mine fields, that makes the job of clearing them difficult. Air power or artillery is what’s needed now. But despite that, Ukraine has widened its bridge head across the Dnieper, and continues to consolidate its hold on Robotyne, and continues to slowly encircle Bakhmut, and is improvising air power with cheap hobby drones, and expensive missiles of various types.


51 posted on 09/30/2023 9:45:15 PM PDT by Eleutheria5 (Every Goliath has his David. Child in need of a CGM system. https://gofund.me/6452dbf1. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson