I prefer to do my thinking ahead on the four last things.
It seems to me that for some Joshua should have kept the trumpet muffled.
Winning the presidential election (which I do hope to see) does not in anyway mean an end to state abortion laws that scuttle any protection to the preborn at any stage of gestation.
It would mean an opportunity to undo the damage done by previous administrations but you are fooling yourself if you think those battles will be easily won. It is not a matter of “If we are silent on abortion then we can swoop in and make all things new again.” The word entrenched comes to my mind when thinking about D.C.
If you show that once a principle becomes politically inconvenient you are willing to abandon it even for a short time you become part of what you were fighting against. Why not stand firm and be clear some wrongs should not be compromised on. There is nothing in the Constitution that bars Congress from deciding that the preborn at a certain stage deserve the protection offered to those already born.
Go play checkers. Let thinkers accomplish the actual goal.