Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: LS
I disagree that an Act ever has legal relevance to an Amendment

But the 14th amendment specifically gives Congress the power to enforce it in two places:

In Section 3:

But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.
In Section 5:
The Congress shall have power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.
How does Congress enforce a Constitutional provision except via acts?

The Amnesty Act of 1872 removed the disability just as Section 3 said Congress can do. The question is whether it removed it only for people who met the conditions at the time or if it removed the disability in perpetuity because it wasn't specific except to excepting two Congresses from it.

-PJ

30 posted on 09/17/2023 10:36:18 AM PDT by Political Junkie Too ( * LAAP = Left-wing Activist Agitprop Press (formerly known as the MSM))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]


To: Political Junkie Too

All things are in context. Two courts have now ruled this is Civil War related only. The only case that did not do so was not appealed.

You can keep arguing this, but it’s a done deal and story after story is coming out that DemoKKKrats know it.


31 posted on 09/18/2023 7:26:22 AM PDT by LS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson