Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: LS
I’ve been over this and over this. The 14th ONLY refers to the Civil War...

The problem as I see it (and hasn't been mentioned by others) is that they don't need the 14th amendment; there is also 18 U.S. Code § 2383 - Rebellion or insurrection:

Whoever incites, sets on foot, assists, or engages in any rebellion or insurrection against the authority of the United States or the laws thereof, or gives aid or comfort thereto, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.
Someone first needs to indict someone for insurrection under this federal code, not the 14th amendment.

-PJ

37 posted on 09/06/2023 12:05:46 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too ( * LAAP = Left-wing Activist Agitprop Press (formerly known as the MSM))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]


To: Political Junkie Too

Agree, but again, that code’s intent was related to the Civil War. Context would take all of these challenges off the table, which is why so far 2 cases have been tossed, one could have been appealed except for money.


57 posted on 09/06/2023 3:41:03 PM PDT by LS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson