“Where in the Constitution does that authority come from?”
I don’t think schools should be teaching or discussing this crap but the basis of the ruling must be that parents can withdraw a child from a school but if they choose a school they must abide by their curriculum.
Why must the rule be that way when the curriculum arguably conflicts with traditional faith and morals?
If I recall what I’ve read elsewhere about this ruling it was that the parents did not have standing and could not show their children had suffered harm from the policy. I could be wrong on that, but I don’t think the option of withdrawing students was part of the ruling.