[SeekAndFind]

That tells us a lot about what she's learned in her home and how she would naturally think now. It also explains why Congress is investigating her political bias, according to the Post.

Even more important, what is the communist record on justice?

Show trials. Imprisonment without trial. Kangaroo courts and trumped-up charges. Knocks on doors in the middle of the night. Official lies. Draconian punishments and summary executions and 'liquidations' of those dissenting. Political prisoners.

She's renounced none of that.

That certainly explains her record as a judge, throwing January 6 defendants into prison for longer terms than even the prosecutors requested. 

With that background and zero evidence whatsoever of renunciation of those ideas and practices, this is obviously someone who cannot be fair at a trial of a conservative with anti-communist views. To her, Trump is just a white guard general to do away with as a good commissar would. Anybody think she's someone who could be fair in a trial?

[EinNYC]

The more twisted she is, the better chance for an appeal. She is bound to screw up in her fevered fervor.