But if your servers are in the US, and you earn no revenue from the EU — well, they can order you to take something down, and even fine you — but they have no jurisdiction to enforce their orders or fines, do they?
In the News/Activism forum, on a thread titled The Digital Services Act Will Give the EU Sweeping New Censorship Powers, Forcing X and Facebook to Remove Content that Challenges Mass Migration, Transgender Ideology or Net Zero, Angelino97 wrote: |
But if your servers are in the US, and you earn no revenue from the EU — well, they can order you to take something down, and even fine you — but they have no jurisdiction to enforce their orders or fines, do they? |
Correct. I think the true goal those EU creeps have is to ban social media because it is 'ruining' the control of the narrative. So they make a rule they can't enforce, and then when Twitter et. al. break it, they ban the platform from their countries. It means the EU is able to eliminate the public's access to something outside EU propaganda. Social media is exposing the Covid, Covid 'vax', corruption, totalitarian plans etc. and the oligarchs want to end it for their countries.