[Gunslingr3]

You ducked the question, you coward. Now you’re trying to convince yourself this weapon system is different than the others, so I ask, on what basis do you deny this too will happen? When it comes to pass like the others, how will you react? Will your disbelief disappear like magic, or will you pivot to how these newer and more numerous platforms are somehow worse than the old Soviet junk that Ukraine started the war with?

We're observing a peer-to-peer war in The Ukraine, where the PEER adversaries are slugging it out like an Irish stand-down. Only Russia has an 8 to 1 advantage in artillery, and has totally degraded the Ukrainian air defense system.

If Russia still possesses an 8-1 advantage, why do you consider Ukraine their peer? Shouldn't the side with 8x the artillery be considerably superior to the side that has only 1/8th the artillery?

Why, with this presumed enormous artillery advantage, did the Russians find themselves forced back from Nikolaev into a "futile" position in Kherson where they were forced to flee across the river?

How bad does the Russian army suck to possess an 8-1 advantage in artillery and still get forced into retreat after retreat by the foe you started the war with?

Why do you think that is happening to the Russian forces if they possess this massive superiority in arms? Are they not even 1/8th as competent as the Ukrainians? What's the reason for their repeated reversals and retreats from "futile" fighting positions in Ukraine? How do you explain it to yourself?

[kiryandil]

The coward who is touting the Ukraine's vaporware F-16s with non-existent pilots is attacking me with his denials once again.

As the dyslexic guy said:

Denali ain't just a mountain in Alaska.