Paid disrupters? I’d believe your statement except there’s a problem with your lack of logic. If you click on each member who casts doubt (and there’s enough of that given last failures), each has been members for 10-15+ years. So no, just because people are tired of the rinse and repeat does not make it “paid disrupters.”
Oh come on. There are many people here who agree that there was major vote fraud and that it cannot be ignored. And yet all of the first comments are all slanted against that. Probability dictates that the first comments would at least be mixed.