[rlmorel]

"...True the Vote says they have evidence and then doesn't produce it..."

I assume you have not seen the documentary or read the book, both of which go into great deal about their use of technology and methods applied to reach their conclusions. If you haven't see it, you should.

If you have seen it, and think it shows nothing, I would be willing to debate you in this forum.

Just a suggestion-you shouldn't call that posted article a "screed" unless you believe it, and that would beg the question from some of why are you frequenting Free Republic. It is nothing of the sort, and the use of that specific term has meaning, that if applied directly, reflects on the values of the person using it in this context.

[BikerJoe]

reflects on the values of the person using it in this context.

Look chief, just because I have a brain doesn't mean I'm not very conservative.

The article was somewhat typical of a lot of web writings. Some hyper-ventilating with no details.

For instance, the title says True the Vote people went to jail. Which people, and for what? Or are they only talking about D'Souza?

True the Vote was asked to produce evidence it said it had. They didn't. Then there was legal action, and True the Vote said any claim of them not producing evidence was inaccurate? I'd like a lot more details, but I have a business to run and don't have time to watch 30 minute youtube videos with 30 seconds of information in them.