Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RideForever

RideForever wrote: “From the lack of effort to even perform just 16 autopsies, I’m betting the 2 that were done showed a massive invasive ‘spike’ infection like they saw in the rats maternity testing, and didn’t want to see any more ‘bad news’ and decided not to do autopsies.”

I would bet the reason the authors didn’t provide the results fo the two autopsies is because the two autopsies didn’t suppor their narrative that the vaccines caused their deaths.


9 posted on 07/24/2023 12:10:37 PM PDT by DugwayDuke (Most pick the expert who says the things they agree with.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: DugwayDuke
If they were getting such great results, as DugwayDuke suggests, why wouldn't they be encouraged to do more autopsies instead of fewer? Especially after the rat testing, which he fails to rationalize with a possible 'clean' mandatory autopsy report. They had the bodies.

Remember it took a court order to get these documents published, which is crazy if the trial results were as glowing as DugwayDuke surmises.

10 posted on 07/24/2023 8:52:03 PM PDT by RideForever (Damn, another dangling par .....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson