RideForever wrote: “If they were getting such great results, as DugwayDuke suggests, why wouldn’t they be encouraged to do more autopsies instead of fewer? Especially after the rat testing, which he fails to rationalize with a possible ‘clean’ mandatory autopsy report. They had the bodies.”
No, they did not have the bodies. The bodies belonged to the next-of-kin which may not have wanted the autopsies. Then again, in some cases, there may have been no reason to do the autopsies. For example, where the cause of death was clear, ie, accidents, suicides, homicides, etc.
DugwayDuke wrote - a bunch of nonsense to waste readers’ time. The article stated the body count and body availability, and DugWayDuke decided to change the numbers, apparently, and give bogus reasons for the change. He has no clue if any of the bodies actually had a next-of-kin, for example.