Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RandFan

No.

There is no way of knowing that this is not actually murder.

Once being suffocated she had no way of indicating she changed her mind.

“Assisted suicide” laws are covers for murderers.

They are incentives to suicide.

And if they involve others they destroy others.

Unless you are completely paralyzed you are able to look yourself without “help” in any number of ways. You DO NOT need assistance and should not be allowed to have it.

Interesting he did not choose a kinder way to kill her. An overdose, care in monoxide, shooting her in the head. No. He had to smother her.


20 posted on 07/21/2023 12:08:06 PM PDT by Persevero (You cannot comply your way out of tyranny. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Persevero
Interesting he did not choose a kinder way to kill her.

That was my thought, too. I can almost imagine circumstances that would justify something like this but to do it by suffocation sounds grusome. She must have struggled - even if you think you want to die the reflex to breathe can't be overcome.

36 posted on 07/21/2023 3:27:53 PM PDT by TexasKamaAina (The time is out of joint. - Hamlet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson