Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Reno89519

No, Vattel didn’t define NBC that way. He didn’t use the term, but instead used “indigenes” and “natives”. It took a bad translation made AFTER the US Constitution to insert that.


33 posted on 07/20/2023 8:12:25 PM PDT by Mr Rogers (We're a nation of feelings, not thoughts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Mr Rogers
No, Vattel didn’t define NBC that way. He didn’t use the term, but instead used “indigenes” and “natives”. It took a bad translation made AFTER the US Constitution to insert that.

"Les naturels, ou indigenes, sont ceux qui sont nes dans le pays, de parens citoyens"

He used the word "Citoyen", which is the word we still use, rather than the English "Subject."

How did we switch? Why did we switch?

Could it be that when we abandoned "Subject", with all it's "perpetual allegiance" connotations, we embraced the source of law that uses the term "Citizen"?

"Citizen" is barely referenced in English Law of that era, and it did not utilize the meaning we use today.

58 posted on 07/21/2023 1:33:48 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson