Well, you need to go and get you a computer that can access youtube, or go to a public library. Heck, a cheap chromebook can access youtube, and you can get a new one at WalMart for about $150. If you are poor, use Affirm to get notes on one. HP has decent laptops for sub-$400. WalMart has refurbished computers for sub $200, some with monitors and the whole works. Klarna is also available, and will bust your bill into 1 pmt every two weeks, with no interest.
Whatever, you need to watch these type of videos, and see these SovCit nutjobs spewing off about how they ain’t driving, they’re traveling, and they don’t need no license for that. Watch them try to spring Black’s Law Dictionary on hapless cops. Watch them getting maced and tased and screaming like little girls.
Because those people are YOU! They are crazy in the same way that you are crazy, and you need to see what it looks like to the outside world. You have spent 16 years involved in this madness, and you need to wake the f—k up!
Among other things I do, I write software, and this one has all my code on it. It does the job.
But that is the "can't" part of my reasons for not watching your videos. For the "won't", I don't see them as having any information that is useful to me.
You speak of "Sovereign American Citizens." I have plenty of first hand knowledge of those. I was a political activist in the 1990s and I have met a lot of people that believe in that stuff.
All you can do is smile and change the subject.
I knew some of them who were doctors, lawyers, engineers, and so forth. I remember a certain Doctor that went on and on about "shark DNA" being used in the vaccines they gave the soldiers going into the gulf war, and this was what was causing "gulf war syndrome."
I've heard the "gold fringed flag" spiel, i've heard about the Bilderberg and the Rothschildzs, the "Protocols of the Elders of Zion", the "New World Order", "adrenochrome", The JFK assassination, the "council on foreign relations", the moon landing was faked, and on and on and on.
Never took any of it seriously. Still don't.
But the idea that the courts would get something absolutely wrong, and then double down on it over and over again?
I find that idea quite plausible because I've seen them making ridiculous decisions all throughout history.
Plessy v Ferguson comes to mind.