Okay, now I think I understand what you are saying.
The aliens naturalized by the Massachusetts legislature who were “deemed, adjudged, and taken to be” free citizens of the Commonwealth in fact did become free citizens of the Commonwealth but they did not have “all the liberties, rights and privileges” of the natural born citizen/subjects.
Massachusetts only pretended to give them “all the liberties, rights and privileges” of a natural born citizen/subject. This in spite of the language in the acts saying the newly naturalized citizens were “entitled to all the liberties, privileges and immunities” of natural born citizens/subjects.
You said, “Massachusetts only pretended to give them “all the liberties, rights and privileges” of a natural born citizen/subject. This in spite of the language in the acts saying the newly naturalized citizens were “entitled to all the liberties, privileges and immunities” of natural born citizens/subjects.”
ROTFLMAO!
Are you deliberately trying to misunderstand?
When a family adopts a child, what "liberties, rights and privileges", does the adopted child get?
Massachusetts only pretended to give them “all the liberties, rights and privileges” of a natural born citizen/subject. This in spite of the language in the acts saying the newly naturalized citizens were “entitled to all the liberties, privileges and immunities” of natural born citizens/subjects.
Recognizing that someone is *NOT* a natural born citizen, yet giving them all the privileges of one is simply an acknowledgment of the truth.
You keep failing to notice they keep using "deemed", "ajudged" and "taken to be", when they could have said "is."
Two quarters may equal a half dollar in value, but they are *NOT* the same thing.