To: ChicagoConservative27
“...carrying a flaming tiki torch at the 2017 rally with the intent to intimidate...”
I realize we’ve been living in Clown World for some time now, but who is intimidated by a tiki torch?
3 posted on
07/18/2023 9:19:43 AM PDT by
hanamizu
To: hanamizu
>I realize we’ve been living in Clown World for some time now, but who is intimidated by a tiki torch?
Especially since Spencer and Kessler were obvious plants.
6 posted on
07/18/2023 9:33:01 AM PDT by
struggle
To: hanamizu
Frightening, but burning businesses, courthouses, and police cars are protected by the 1st amendment for sure.
To: hanamizu
Seems to based on a Supreme court ruling that burning a cross is intimidation and a violation of the first amendment. The DA believes he can expand that to tiki torchs.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virginia_v._Black By that logic any protest is intimidation.
To: hanamizu
I realize we’ve been living in Clown World for some time now, but who is intimidated by a tiki torch?
11 posted on
07/18/2023 9:36:37 AM PDT by
fidelis
(👈 Under no obligation to respond to rude, ignorant, abusive, bellicose, and obnoxious posts.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson