Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Petrosius; woodpusher
Of course Russia's military invasion in 2014 precluded any attempt at a political resolution. But I guess that is OK because they are Russians.

Crimea was annexed after entities openly hostile to Russian interests claimed political power in Ukraine.

Notwithstanding whether or not the people of Crimea were okay with said annexation (because some sources say yes, others no, and the remainder are more ambiguous): given that Crimea holds Russia's only year-wound warm-water port (historically speaking), it is no surprise that Russia would seek to guarantee access to Sevastopol in the brief power vacuum that resulted after the Maidan Revolution.

Any other country in an analogous situation (America included) with an interest in power projection and being a Great Power would have done the same.

193 posted on 07/10/2023 12:19:11 PM PDT by Ultra Sonic 007 (There is nothing new under the sun.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 192 | View Replies ]


To: Ultra Sonic 007

What a complete rationalization. Friendly and hostile governments come and go in all countries. Ukraine is not a vassal state of Russia in which Russia has the right to a friendly government. Nor was Russia’s naval base at Sevastopol threatened by the new government. Rather, Putin coveted Crimea and used the events in 2014 as an excuse to grab it. Overall, as he has indicated in multiple addresses, Putin does not accept Ukrainian independence and wishes to correct Lenin’s big mistake and reabsorb it back into Russia, regardless of the Ukrainians’ desire for independence. Everything else is just an excuse for this ambition.


195 posted on 07/10/2023 12:41:46 PM PDT by Petrosius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 193 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson