“So the “despicable” decision that the state cannot force you to speak when you don’t not want to speak could be thrown out because it was moot before it was decided because the party had no standing to bring it and it was all based upon a fraud on the court?”
Maybe that’s the argument. But this is a declaratory relief action. In any event, the argument lost, whatever it was.
Was the Colorado law declared unconstitutional based originally on a fraudulent case filing?
If so the state might want to try to vacate the ruling that invalidated its precious law.
So we were defrauded into ruling against your position and now you want to argue that you didn’t have that case in the first place because you don’t like the outcome of your fraud namely that you cannot use the courts to force someone to speak against their deeply held religious convictions.