[philman_36]

Why aren't you angry with the Supreme Court for rejecting challenges to the ban?
I sure am, and with Congress as well.

Laying the problem at the feet of one person shows your narrow mindedness.
A myopic view of things hides much from the observer.

[Fury]

Re: 143 - now it’s your turn. Please provide the case(s) where the USSC refused to hear challenges to the bump stock ban.

Laying the problem at the feet of one person shows your narrow mindedness.

Oh, come on. There would be no bump stock ban if it were not for one person - President Trump. He directed Jeff Sessions to initiate a request that ultimately resulted in a bump stock being classified as a machine gun. In other words, the President used the Federal bureaucracy - some might call it the Deep State - to classify a gun part to be equivalent to a machine gun.

[Fury]

And stick to the issues - you’ve stated I’m narrow minded and that I posted a stupid comment.

If you can’t stick to the issues, then what’s the point?

[philman_36]

I told you. A myopic view of things hides much from the observer.