Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Reno89519

“He doesn’t need to release the content of the DoD Iran attack plans to defend why he had them, whether he declassified them or not, and how they were personal presidential papers.”

Those papers do not exist in the body of evidence sport. He was recorded supposedly discussing the plans. But they were not there in the raid, and they are not in evidence. He is not charged with taking them. He is charged under the Wilson Era law for discussing them. Based on a clip of a recording out of context.


25 posted on 06/19/2023 10:53:37 AM PDT by DesertRhino (Dogs are called man's best friend. Moslems hate dogs. Add it up..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: DesertRhino

But...but...but...ABC/CBS/NBC/NYT/WAPO/CNN all say they were attack plans, and just for good measure, they threw in that the IBCM launch codes were there too.

Just for good measure, don’t ya know. (only kidding about the launch codes, but...does that sound any more outlandish than charging him under the Espionage Act?)

Espionage. That’s the ticket. Espionage.

What a farce. But hey, there are brains full of mush that just suck that up.


33 posted on 06/19/2023 11:11:45 AM PDT by rlmorel ("If you think tough men are dangerous, just wait until you see what weak men are capable of." JBP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson