Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Redmen4ever

You put work into that, and I understood it the first time, so that’s good.

I think I can see where you are coming from. If we were back in the 60’s I would probably agree with most of what you have said here.

My friend, we are staring down the barrel of full throated communism. Camps, eating grass, and forced labor. It is time to get nasty. I don’t want to eat grass, and I don’t want that for my wife and kids.

Some day, if we make it through this, maybe we can get back to politicking like gentlemen. But we are up against an enemy that will (figuratively, for now) smash the wine bottle an try to stab us with it over dinner conversation.

Trump is a brawler. That is what we need.

Now this part you are not going to like. Just because someone is a vet does not make them a good person, or worthy of respect. Their actions and conduct garner that. I do not like McCain. I do not like Gen. Milley, or John Kerry either. A person can make this judgement whether they served or not. I met dudes in the military that you would not want around your kids or daughters. But mostly they were good people.

McConnell.... under his leadership we have been brought to the precipice of communism. Yes, dumb SoB or actually more likely corrupt SOB is appropriate.

To blindly support the “team” is what the Democrats do. It is a collectivist or union mindset. Do that long enough and eventually we’ll all be commies, sort of like where we are now.

Trump has a family that is 10s, wildly successful, beautiful, smart, and loyal. That is not a good avenue of attack. But that does not stop the left from going for it.

Settling is admitting guilt. Bad move - don’t believe me? Check out the movie Dinesh did on Hillary. Not a good avenue of attack, but the left uses it.

And finally, it is bad tactic to allow your enemy to give you their talking points. Do not take their advice, do not accept their council, and for Pete’s sake don’t let them pick your Generals... it is not in your best interest.

Oh, and you were in the military and nobody ever made a small dick joke? What the heck branch was that? XD XD XD.

We’re going to need to toughen up some, or it will be boiled grass and mining for our retirement.


49 posted on 06/18/2023 8:32:17 AM PDT by Sarcazmo (I live by the Golden Rule. As applied by others; I'm not selfish.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]


To: Sarcazmo

If America is facing full-throated communism, we need a winner.

Trump grew tired of winning in 2018. We lost the House that year under Trump. Then, two years later, we lost the Senate as well as the White House under Trump. That’s called losing. No matter that many of us consider Trump to be a hero, we should prefer politicians who win.

Trump says he lost in 2020 because the election was rigged (conveniently ignoring that he was president when we lost the House in 2018). Was Trump powerless in 2020? No. He was president. What did he do in 2020 to prevent the election from being rigged? Again, we need politicians who win. In war, Douglas McArthur said, there is no substitute for victory.

I will now address your idea that we need a gutter fighter to fight the communists. First of all, Donald Trump isn’t a winner. He lost the House in 2018, and the Senate and the Presidency in 2020.

Second, while being a nasty son of a bitch may be advantageous in the short run, being nice is better in the long run. Granted, you might not believe this.

I notice you have a lot of unconventional ideas. You like people who avoid military service and don’t like veterans. You like people who curse, not people who speak in proper English. You like people who cheat on their taxes and on their wives, and whose businesses commit fraud. I’ll just say your idea that to win you have to be a nasty son of a bitch is unconventional.

Third, to be more specific about this, we need a President will appoint decent people to his staff and to the cabinet instead of the sleazebag losers that Trump appointed; who can work with almost all Republicans in the House and Senate to enact legislation; and, who can build on our majorities in the House and the Senate, not lose our majorities to the other party.

A junkyard dog as you prefer could only succeed as a dictator, something our system of checks and balances is designed to prevent.


52 posted on 06/18/2023 6:55:22 PM PDT by Redmen4ever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson