Completely ridiculous. Settled law means the Supreme Court has already ruled on it. This court is at so low of a level it can’t even carry enough weight that it must be considered as part of the new judge’s ruling. She can even bar those results from being presented as evidence in the new trial, and be well within her rights. You clearly have no idea what you’re talking about. And are a great example of why Trump and his team spreading lies about the law and this case are dangerous. I hope he can get off, but not this way, by flooding the public with BS.
Its settled law unless and until it is overruled. Even in that case, Trump has the defense that he was relying on the ruling of the federal courts under the Presidential Records Act.
She can even bar those results from being presented as evidence in the new trial, and be well within her rights. You clearly have no idea what you’re talking about.
She can? The judge in a previous case can prevent her ruling from being cited in a future case? Gosh, that wasn't on the bar exam when I took it. LOL! It is YOU who has no idea what he's talking about. And it is YOU who is a great example of the Democrats/DOJ/Corporate Media spreading lies about the law and this case.