You need to understand the difference.
And I gave you the judge's ruling that contains the citation:
She's getting that from section 2203. Are you saying that you looked and it's not in section 2203?
The judge is clearly saying that her court will not override the president's decision.
I'm not missing the point at all. My first response to you was contesting your claim that the President determines what are Presidential Records, and what are Personal Records. I've since cited the exact law multiple times, known as the Presidential Records Act, that makes these determinations, not the President. You've continued to repeat your claim that it's the President's discretion, in direct contrast to the relevant law, without providing any text from the actual law to support your claim.
You documented the definitions. You did not document who determines if a document meets those definitions. It just doesn't happen by magic.
I did not document or define anything. I simply cited the law, which is extremely clear in defining those terms. It still doesn't appear you've even reviewed the link I provided to the actual law, yet.
I gave you the judge's ruling
One activist judge making a non-precedent ruling in a civil circuit court does not define what the law says. I am citing, and posting, the law, itself. Have you read it yet? Where does it say the President is allowed to determine what is Presidential and Personal, as you have claimed.
She's getting that from section 2203. Are you saying that you looked and it's not in section 2203?
LOL! That's the same law I've been posting, over and over. Except my link comes direct from the government, where the definitions are included. Further proof you've still never even looked at that link to the actual law I've given you, and have based your entire argument on the bogus interpretation of a Clinton activist judge, and some link to a university that doesn't even contain the full contents of the law.